The prognostic tables below are based on Framingham Study data and are derived from a published equation predicting total CVD risk (1). The treatment recommendations are derived from New Zealand guidelines on the management of raised blood pressure (2) and New Zealand guidelines on the management of dyslipidaemia (3).
Click here if you've got a swanky browser and want to see the tables with frames
This page is set to use frames to display the key in the lower part of your browser's window. If your browser doesn't support frames or tables with coloured cell backgrounds, click here and you'll get them as gifs (January 1997 version, to be updated).
Assessment of Absolute Risk of Cardiovascular Event
A major CVD event is defined as a coronary-related death, myocardial infarction (MI), new angina, a stroke or TIA, or the development of congestive heart failure or peripheral vascular syndrome.
Assumes that BP reduction of about 12 / 6 mmHg in patients with BP > 140-150 / 90 mmHg, or cholesterol reduction of about 20% in patients with total cholesterol > 5.0-5.5 mmol/L, produces an approximate 30% reduction in CVD risk, whatever the pre-treatment absolute risk.
Read off estimated benefit from colour code in key to table. Benefit is expressed as:

Key to these tables | How to use these tables | View in Black & White
Women

How to use these tables | View in Black & White
Back to Table of CVD Risk for Men | Back to Table of CVD Risk for Women | Back to the start of this document
| Prognosis | Benefit 1 | Benefit 2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 yr CVD risk (non-fatal and fatal) | CVD events prevented per 100 treated for 5 yrs** | NNT for 5 years** | |||
| > 30% | > 10 per 100 | <10 | Suggested starting point for discussion with patient about drug treatment | ||
| 25-30% | 9 per 100 | 11 | |||
| 20-25% | 7.5 per 100 | 13 | |||
| 15-20% | 6 per 100 | 16 | |||
| 10-15% | 4 per 100 | 25 | |||
| 5-10% | 2.5 per 100 | 40 | |||
| 2.5-5% | 1.25 per 100 | 80 | |||
| <2.5% | <0.8 per 100 | > 120 |
| * | cells with this marker indicate that in patients with very high levels of cholesterol (> about 8.5-9 mmol/L) or blood pressure (> about 170 / 100 mmHg), the risk equations may underestimate the true risk. Therefore it is recommended that treatment be considered at lower absolute CVD risks than in other patients. |
| ** | assumes BP reduction of about 12 / 6 mmHg in patients with BP > 140-150 / 90, or cholesterol reduction of about 20% in patients with total cholesterol > 5.0-5.5 mmol/L, produces an approximate 30% reduction in CVD risk, whatever the pre-treatment absolute risk. |
Anderson KM, Wilson PWF, Odell PM, Kannel WB, An updated coronary risk profile, Circulation 1991; 83(1):356-62.
MacMahon S, Rogers A. The effects of antihypertensive treatment on vascular disease: re-appraisal of the evidence in 1993. J Vasc Med Biol 1993;4:265-71
Sacks FM, Pfeffer MA, Moye LA, et al. The effect of pravastatin on coronary events after myocardial infarction in patients with average cholesterol levels. N Engl J Med 1996;335:1001-9.
Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study Group. Randomised controlled trial of cholesterol lowering in 4444 patients with coronary heart disease: the Scandinavian Simvastatin Study. Lancet 1994;344:1383-9.
Shepherd J, Cobbe S, Ford I et al. Prevention of coronary heart disease with pravastatin in men with hypercholesterolaemia. N Engl J Med 1995;333:1301-7
Wolf PA, D'Agostino RB, Belanger AJ, Kannel WB. Probability of stroke: a risk profile from the Framingham Study. Stroke 1991; 22(3):312-8.