CEBM Home Page Index to this Site How to use the site Teaching Resources and Activities The CAT Bank About the Book <I>How to Practice and Teach EBM</i> EBM Glossary The EBM ToolBox

PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING GRADUATES ARE MORE UP TO DATE 15 YEARS LATER (IN MANAGING HYPERTENSION) THAN GRADUATES OF TRADITIONAL MEDICAL SCHOOLS.

Clinical Bottom Line:
Cohorts from a self-directed PBL medical school are more up to date in tests of knowledge about managing hypertension than cohorts from a traditional school up to and including 15 years after graduation.
Appraised by: Sackett, Medicine, Oxford

Educational Scenario: You are discussing the advantages and disadvantages of problem-based learning (PBL) and wonder what the long-term effects are in terms of tangible clinical competency.

Three-part Question: In helping medical students learn to become competent clinicians, would PBL make them more competent after they're out in practice for a few years?

Search Terms: none; DLS designed an RCT of this in 1968 but it was turned down by the deans. A McMaster medical student asked the same question 20 years later and performed a cohort study of graduates from a PBL and a traditional medical school. DLS wasn't part of that research team, but learned its result.

The Study:
Random samples (N=48 for each) of GPs who graduated from a PBL school (McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario) and a traditional school (U of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario), stratified for year of graduation (1974-85) and sex, were sent questionnaires with 52 questions about how to measure blood pressure, which levels to treat, pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment, detecting and managing low compliance, and follow-up. Response rates were 87% in both cohorts.



Click here to comment on this CAT
Search for more CAts, NNTs and Red Book entries