| Clinical Bottom Line: The available Level I evidence indicates that didactic sessions (lectures, even with handouts) do not improve clinicians' performance. |
Educational Scenario: You have your educational objectives and a half-day with your trainees. How much time should you allot to a didactic lecture?
Three-part Question: When I want to improve my trainees' clinical performance, does a didactic lecture (maybe with a hand-out) result in clinically significant improvements in how they look after patients?
Search Terms: none; DLS was asked to review the draft of Thomson MA et al: A systematic review of educational meetings, workshops, and traineeships to improve professional practice and health care outcomes.
The Systematic Review:
Examined MEDLINE (1966-1996) and EMBASE (1994-1996) and studied all 4 randomised trials of lectures to practicing health professionals that included objective measures of subsequent clinical performance (there were 24 trials of other educational manoeuvres in this systematic review).
| Ref | Learners | Taught by: | Clinical Outcomes | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 385 French GPs | A day of lectures and handouts | Better use of mammography and cervical cytology | No clinically important effects |
| 2 | 197 US Physicians | A 3 hour lecture | Better use of cholesterol testing | No clinically important effects |
| 3 | 35 Nurses who care for diabetics | 7 20-minute lectures (q 2 wks) | Better care of diabetic patients | No clinically important effects |
| 4 | 83 post-graduate trainees and consultants in ITU | 6 lectures over 6 months | Better concurrent care of patients with "do not resuscitate" orders. | No clinically important effects |
Comments:
Expiry date: June 1998
References:
Click here to comment on this CAT |
![]() |